The roots from two large trees growing on one property encroached onto a neighboring property. The neighboring owner removed the roots, which damaged the trees and led to a lawsuit. The trial court dismissed the lawsuit, and the Court of Appeals affirmed that dismissal in a published opinion last month. The Court held that the neighboring owner had the right to remove the portions of the roots that encroached onto his property, and it further held that he did not owe the trees' owner a duty of due care to prevent damage to the trees.
The Court noted during its opinion that tree branches that extend over the land of another are "technical nuisances [that] the person over whose land they extend may cut ... off." It also mentioned an unusual case in which one set of neighbors sued another set of neighbors for building a condominium that blocked their western view. The Court decided in that case that the plaintiffs had no right to bring a nuisance action because they "did not possess any easement of light, air, or view, nor do they possess any legal cause for complaint or interference therewith by the lawful erection of a building on respondents' property." The condominium was permitted to remain.
When people live together in close proximity, they will inevitably use their properties in ways that will be annoying to each other and detrimental to each others' interests at times. However, this does not necessarily mean that one of the parties has a legal claim against the other. Use of real property is governed by overlapping layers of covenants, easements, ordinances, statutes, and case law. Those sources must be examined in each case to determine whether the disputed use at issue is legal.