May 29, 2017

Washington Court of Appeals Reverses Trial Court's Partition of Common Area

The Washington Court of Appeals ruled in an unpublished opinion last month that partition of a common area created by the deeds of four adjacent properties was not a remedy available to the trial court when the property owners could not agree about the use or maintenance of that common area. 

Each residential property owner in this case also owned an undivided one-fourth interest in a common area.  The Court held that the co-owners' equitable interests in the common area would be defeated if it were to be partitioned without the agreement of all four of them.  It then shifted to the central dispute regarding a tennis court on the common area - concluding that "[w]hether the tennis court is to be maintained or replaced, all owners are entitled to have the action taken in a reasonable and timely manner, overseen by the trial court if necessary." The Court emphasized that leaving the tennis court in a state of "perpetual disrepair" is not acceptable.

April 5, 2017

Court of Appeals Upholds Homeowners Association's Application of Bylaws

The Washington Court of Appeals recently upheld a homeowners association's interpretation and application of its bylaws in a published opinion.  Members of the association challenged its authority to impose membership fees and liens because they claimed that its board of directors was improperly constituted.  The association had attempted to elect board members every year, but there was no quorum at the annual meetings. The association responded by acting according to sections of its bylaws and state law that allow an appointed board member to serve out the unexpired portion of a "term"; that is, until a quorum can be reached and a proper election can be held.  The Court ruled that the association's actions to maintain a functioning board were valid.  It pointed out that the approximately 10,150 homeowners associations located in Washington "must be given room to interpret and apply their own governing documents as long as the result is neither arbitrary nor unreasonable."     

March 9, 2017

The Importance of Seeing Both Sides

I just had a most unpleasant conversation with another attorney. This individual was extremely hostile and never budged from his strident position. He was either unwilling or unable to consider my client's side of the dispute.  It was obviously an unproductive conversation. I felt angry that he was preventing the problem from being appropriately resolved.

It is rare that one party is completely in the right.  I pride myself on making every effort to see the other person's point of view, and many clients have complimented me on my ability to do so. This allows me to help community associations avoid lengthy legal conflicts.  

February 13, 2017

Small Associations Need Lawyers Too!

Many boards of small condominium and homeowners associations believe that legal services are out of their financial reach.  However, this is not the case if they work with my office.  We have productive relationships with a large number of small community associations, and one of the keys to our success in that area is our ability to achieve associations' goals both effectively and efficiently.  Sometimes a brief phone call or email is all it takes to resolve an issue or avoid a mistake.  If your association does not have an attorney to help it understand its obligations and enforce its documents, then it should rectify that situation as soon as possible.  

January 5, 2017

Washington Court of Appeals Issues Redemption Act Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals recently issued a published opinion regarding the application of the Washington Redemption Act (RCW 6.23).  The Court held that "a condominium owner occupying the condominium as a residence at the time of a judicial foreclosure of a condominium lien has the right to possession during the redemption period, with no obligation to pay for the value of the occupation." However, the Court also noted that "nonjudicial foreclosure of the assessment lien is not subject to the right of possession."

Foreclosing a lien is a difficult decision.  My office can help your association evaluate its foreclosure options.

January 2, 2017

Washington Court of Appeals Rules in Favor of Association in Collection Dispute

The Washington Court of Appeals ruled in favor of a Camas homeowners association’s actions concerning board membership and delinquent assessments in a recent unpublished opinion.  The Court's opinion begins by stating that “[w]e afford great deference to an organization’s interpretation of its Bylaws, and will only invalidate an interpretation if it is arbitrary and unreasonable …. [H]omeowners associations must be given room to interpret and apply their own governing documents.”  The opinion points out that the association unsuccessfully attempted to elect board members every year and that in the absence of a quorum the association was permitted to allow an appointed board member to serve out the unexpired portion of a term until a quorum could be reached and a proper annual election could be held. The Court's opinion concludes that the association’s board is properly constituted and that the association has the power to collect assessments and record liens.