Division One of the Washington Court of Appeals recently published an opinion concerning the power of a homeowners association governed by RCW 64.38 (to be distinguished from those governed by RCW 64.90 and condominium associations governed by RCW 64.32, RCW 64.34, or RCW 64.90) to change its set of covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs). The association's CC&Rs restricted its members from obstructing one another's views with six foot tall fences and outbuildings and granted them the authority to change it with seventy-five percent approval. The association adopted a covenant increasing the height constituting an obstruction to fifteen feet and expanding the type of obstructing object to trees and vegetation. An owner argued that this was not a change to the CC&Rs but a new covenant that was not authorized by that document.
Changing the CC&Rs cannot involve eliminating an existing covenant or adding a restriction where none existed before - only modifying that document in a manner that results in less of something (fewer things are restricted or restrictions are lessened) or more of something (more things are restricted or existing restictions are increased). The appeallate court decided that the adopted covenant was a valid change to the CC&Rs rather than an invalid new covenant because it increased certain view obstruction restrictions already in that document.
